Human and Organisational Performance (HOP) Implementation: Case Studies and Analysis
I. Introduction to Human and Organizational Performance (HOP): Principles and Concepts
Human and Organizational Performance (HOP) represents a contemporary, science-based paradigm for understanding and addressing errors within organizations, ultimately aiming to construct systems that are inherently more tolerant of human fallibility 1. This approach moves beyond the traditional focus on individual accountability for mistakes and instead delves into the complex interplay between human actions and the organizational context in which work is performed 2. HOP acknowledges that errors are not isolated incidents but rather symptoms of deeper systemic issues, prompting organizations to proactively design resilient systems rather than solely focusing on preventing individual mistakes 3. It is not a rigid, step-by-step risk management protocol, but rather a fundamental way of perceiving human behavior, the intricacies of work processes, and the crucial role of supporting organizational systems in shaping performance 4.
At the core of HOP lie several fundamental principles that guide its application. The first of these is the recognition that error is a normal and inevitable part of human behavior 1. This principle encourages organizations to shift from a culture of blame towards a more understanding and proactive stance on error management. Secondly, HOP emphasizes that blame is counterproductive and ultimately fixes nothing 2. Assigning blame often leads to fear, secrecy, and a reluctance to report errors, thereby hindering organizational learning and improvement. The third principle highlights that context profoundly influences behavior 2. Organizational systems, culture, resources, and the work environment itself play a significant role in shaping individual actions and decisions. Consequently, understanding this context is vital for identifying the root causes of errors.
Furthermore, HOP underscores that learning is a continuous and vital process for organizational improvement 2. This includes learning not only from failures but also from successes to understand what goes right and why 2. Establishing robust learning systems that analyze events without resorting to blame is crucial for identifying contributing factors and implementing effective corrective actions. The principle of "response matters" highlights the significant impact of leadership's reaction to incidents and errors on the overall organizational culture 2. A punitive response can stifle communication and hinder future reporting, whereas a response focused on learning and improvement fosters transparency and a stronger safety culture 16. Finally, the concept of "work as imagined" versus "work as performed" acknowledges the inherent differences between how tasks are planned and how they are actually executed in the dynamic real world 1. Recognizing this gap is essential for developing realistic procedures and involving frontline employees in identifying practical solutions to workplace challenges.
In contrast to traditional safety approaches that often prioritize adherence to rules and aim for the elimination of human error, HOP adopts a different perspective 5. Traditional models frequently focus on compliance with regulations and procedures, sometimes overlooking the systemic factors that contribute to incidents 5. HOP, on the other hand, places greater emphasis on understanding and mitigating the systemic vulnerabilities that can lead to errors, recognizing that safety is a dynamic and adaptive process 5. This proactive stance aims to identify potential risks before they escalate into incidents by delving into the underlying causes rather than simply addressing surface-level non-compliance 5. Furthermore, HOP actively encourages organizations to move beyond mere compliance checklists and instead cultivate a culture of continuous learning and resilience 5. By fostering trust and collaboration, HOP empowers workers to contribute to safety improvements, recognizing their unique insights into the realities of their work 5. This data-driven approach provides leaders with valuable information to improve systems and processes, ultimately enhancing both safety and operational efficiency 5.
II. Positive Case Studies of HOP Implementation
Several organizations across various industries have successfully implemented HOP principles, yielding significant positive outcomes in terms of safety, efficiency, and employee engagement.
Case Study 1: Manufacturing - Smurfit WestRock
Smurfit WestRock, a global leader in sustainable packaging, embarked on a journey to enhance employee safety involvement through the implementation of a Human and Organizational Performance (HOP) program 17. Recognizing that their existing incident management system was not aligned with the core tenets of HOP, the organization partnered with Benchmark Gensuite to integrate HOP safety principles into their incident investigation processes 17. A key aspect of this integration involved revising the incident forms to better capture the defenses that were in place, the effectiveness of these defenses in preventing incidents, and the specific triggers that led to events 17. Furthermore, Smurfit WestRock began utilizing Benchmark Gensuite’s Describe-It AI advisor to ensure comprehensive documentation of incident details 17. This strategic redesign aimed to foster a shift in how employees approached and understood incidents, aligning with the principles of HOP 17.
The outcomes of this HOP implementation were substantial. Smurfit WestRock experienced a considerable reduction in OSHA recordable incidents and a decrease in life-changing events 17. Notably, there was a significant boost in employee engagement, evidenced by a proactive increase in the submission of near misses and suggestions for improvement 17. The organization also saw a doubling of operational learning events within their system compared to actual injuries, indicating a stronger focus on proactive learning and continuous improvement 17. To further enhance employee engagement, Smurfit WestRock implemented a simple QR code system for reporting safety concerns and hazards, coupled with a feedback loop to inform employees about the actions taken in response to their reports. This resulted in impressive reporting rates across all their sites, signifying a high level of employee involvement and trust in the system 17. This case demonstrates that aligning existing organizational systems with HOP principles, facilitated by technology, can lead to tangible improvements in safety metrics and a more engaged workforce. The successful integration of HOP into the incident management system fostered a culture where employees felt empowered to contribute to safety, leading to a greater emphasis on learning from events rather than simply recording them.
Case Study 2: Logistics - CHEP
CHEP, a global provider of pallet and container pooling services, has deeply integrated HOP principles into the fabric of its operations, embedding them within four key business pillars: exceptional leadership, staff engagement, safe processes, and supporting systems 18. Despite the challenges posed by external factors, CHEP maintained its focus on applying HOP principles across its facilities 18. A significant aspect of their HOP journey involved a shift in their training model, moving away from traditional classroom-based instruction towards competency verification through on-the-job, one-on-one conversations 18. CHEP also proactively adapted existing safety activities to incorporate a HOP approach, such as their 'Take45' leadership and operator safety walks, which now include opportunities for storytelling and shared learning 18. Furthermore, the organization extensively utilized Learning Teams to collaboratively address various operational challenges and improve safety 18.
The adoption of HOP yielded remarkable benefits for CHEP. The company achieved a 30% improvement in the reportable injury frequency rate in FY20 compared to FY19, and an impressive 83% of their locations were reportable injury-free 18. Additionally, CHEP experienced a substantial 64% reduction in the injury severity rate, which translated to an almost 70% reduction in Workers' Compensation payouts 18. Their initial goal of having no significant incidents was realized, with remaining incidents resulting only in minor injuries 18. A 2020 Pulse Survey indicated a significant enhancement in staff engagement, with the safety question receiving the highest rating overall at 87/100, marking an increase from the previous year 18. Notably, employees began proactively requesting the formation of Learning Teams to address issues they identified 18. CHEP exceeded its target for reported hazards and near misses by over 40%, achieving a 99% close-out rate for actions arising from these reports and Learning Teams within the year 18. The outcomes from operational learning directly benefited their people, as they were actively involved in the ideation and development of solutions 18. HOP enabled CHEP to explore situations from different perspectives, leading to higher quality outcomes in key risk focus areas and a deeper understanding of how work is truly performed 18. Beyond safety, HOP also contributed to improved productivity and communication, as demonstrated by examples such as resolving persistent line jams with a simple $100 fix and providing two-way radios to facilitate safer and more efficient line clearing 18. This comprehensive implementation highlights how a deeply embedded HOP philosophy can drive significant improvements across various organizational dimensions. The emphasis on staff engagement and the use of Learning Teams fostered a culture of proactive problem-solving and continuous improvement, leading to both safer and more efficient operations.
Case Study 3: Construction Industry Example
In the high-risk construction industry, the application of Human Organizational Performance (HOP) principles has demonstrated its potential to significantly reduce serious incidents 5. One construction firm, focused on mitigating fall-related incidents, implemented HOP by redesigning its scaffolding systems and enhancing worker training 5. A key element of their approach was to analyze incidents with the aim of identifying areas for system improvement, rather than assigning blame to individual workers for errors 5. This shift in focus, from individual culpability to systemic understanding, led to a remarkable 30% reduction in fall-related incidents within a single year 5. This outcome underscores the effectiveness of applying HOP principles in a traditionally hazardous environment. By concentrating on the systemic factors that contribute to falls, such as the design of scaffolding and the adequacy of training, the company was able to implement more effective preventive measures. This case illustrates how a move away from blaming workers for errors towards a system-oriented analysis can lead to substantial safety improvements in the construction sector.
Case Study 4: Manufacturing Plant Example
A manufacturing plant grappling with frequent equipment malfunctions successfully applied Human Organizational Performance (HOP) principles to address these operational challenges 5. Instead of solely focusing on the immediate causes of the malfunctions, the plant adopted a broader perspective, examining the underlying systemic factors that might be contributing to the issues 5. This investigation revealed that inadequate maintenance schedules were a significant contributing factor 5. By shifting their focus to these systemic issues and implementing improvements to their maintenance protocols, the manufacturing plant achieved a notable improvement in equipment reliability and a 25% reduction in downtime 5. This example demonstrates the versatility of HOP principles, extending their benefits beyond safety to enhance operational efficiency and reduce costs associated with equipment failures. The plant's success highlights the value of looking beyond immediate causes to identify and address the root systemic issues that impact performance.
Other Positive Implementation Examples
Beyond these detailed cases, other examples illustrate the broad applicability of HOP principles. Volvo, for instance, integrates HOP concepts into its automotive designs by prioritizing features that support drivers in making safer decisions, acknowledging the inherent fallibility of human beings 4. Features such as driver fatigue detection systems and collision avoidance technologies exemplify this approach, aiming to mitigate the consequences of potential human errors 4. Early results from Volvo's implementation of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) have shown a significant 27% reduction in bodily injury claim frequency and a 19% reduction in property damage frequency, demonstrating the effectiveness of designing systems with an understanding of potential human errors 4. This illustrates how HOP principles can be applied even in product design to create systems that allow for safe failure and mitigate potential negative outcomes.
III. Negative Case Studies and Challenges in HOP Implementation
While the benefits of HOP are evident in numerous successful implementations, its adoption is not without its challenges. Several factors can hinder the effective implementation of HOP principles within organizations.
Case Study 1: Resistance to Change and Lack of Leadership Buy-in
A significant hurdle in implementing HOP is often the resistance to change from both workers and managers 5. Established beliefs and practices regarding safety, particularly those rooted in compliance and error elimination, can be deeply ingrained and difficult to shift 5. Employees accustomed to traditional, compliance-based approaches may view HOP with skepticism or as simply another fleeting management trend 5. Furthermore, the absence of strong leadership support can severely impede the progress of HOP initiatives 5. Leadership commitment is paramount in setting the organizational tone and providing the necessary resources and advocacy for HOP to take root and flourish 10. Without leaders actively championing HOP principles and demonstrating their commitment through their actions, the initiative is unlikely to gain widespread acceptance or achieve its intended outcomes 5. Additionally, misconceptions about HOP, such as viewing it as being anti-Behavior-Based Safety (BBS), can create unnecessary friction and hinder its adoption 21. It is crucial to clarify that HOP and effective behavioral safety approaches are not mutually exclusive and can, in fact, complement each other by addressing different aspects of safety and performance.
Case Study 2: Issues with Goal Alignment and Inconsistent Practices
Another challenge arises from a lack of goal alignment across different teams or departments within an organization 15. When various parts of the organization have objectives that are not in harmony with the principles of HOP, it can lead to conflicting priorities and hinder the cohesive implementation of the philosophy 15. For instance, a department primarily focused on maximizing production output might be hesitant to allocate time and resources to HOP-related learning activities or to embrace a blame-free approach to incident analysis if it perceives this as potentially impacting production targets. Moreover, an inconsistent application of HOP principles across the organization can significantly undermine the overall effectiveness of the initiative 15. A fragmented or superficial implementation, where some departments fully embrace HOP while others lag behind or adhere to traditional methods, is unlikely to yield the desired widespread cultural shift and improvements in safety and performance. HOP necessitates a consistent and sustained commitment at all levels of the organization to truly transform the culture and realize its full potential.
Common Pitfalls and Challenges Encountered During HOP Implementation
Several common pitfalls can hinder the successful implementation of HOP. One significant challenge is treating HOP as a program rather than a fundamental philosophy or operating model 6. This programmatic approach often leads to a checklist mentality, where organizations focus on implementing specific tools or processes without truly internalizing the underlying principles of HOP, thus failing to embed them deeply within the organizational culture. Over-reliance on the skills of facilitators for Learning Teams can also be a limiting factor 7. The effectiveness of these teams, a key component of HOP's learning approach, can vary significantly depending on the facilitator's expertise in HOP principles and their ability to guide productive and insightful discussions. Without adequately trained facilitators, the potential benefits of Learning Teams may not be fully realized. Furthermore, a potential pitfall is when workers perceive HOP as simply another safety program that ultimately places the responsibility and potential blame on them, despite the philosophy's emphasis on systemic factors 7. Clear communication and genuine employee involvement are crucial to avoid this perception and to foster a sense of shared ownership in the HOP initiative.
Another challenge arises when management expects HOP to be a quick fix or a "magic bullet" solution to all their safety and performance issues 7. HOP is a long-term journey that requires patience and sustained effort to achieve meaningful cultural change and lasting improvements 6. Unrealistic expectations can lead to disappointment and premature abandonment of the initiative. Measuring the impact of HOP, particularly in the early stages, can also be difficult 5. Traditional metrics might not fully capture the qualitative aspects of cultural change and improved learning that are central to HOP. Organizations may need to develop new metrics or adapt existing ones to better assess the effectiveness of their HOP implementation efforts. The natural human tendency to assign blame, especially after serious incidents, can also pose a significant obstacle to the successful adoption of blame-free investigations, a core principle of HOP 16. Overcoming this ingrained reaction requires consistent reinforcement from leadership and a commitment to focusing on learning from failures rather than simply identifying scapegoats. Finally, the lack of a universally agreed-upon definition of HOP and the potential for different interpretations can lead to confusion and inconsistent implementation across organizations 7. Organizations should strive to clearly define what HOP means within their specific context and ensure a shared understanding of its principles and goals among all stakeholders.
IV. Factors Influencing the Success of HOP Implementation
The successful implementation of Human and Organizational Performance (HOP) hinges on several key factors that work synergistically to foster a culture of safety, learning, and continuous improvement.
Leadership Commitment and Engagement
Strong leadership commitment and active engagement are foundational to the success of any HOP program 5. Leaders must unequivocally communicate that safety is a top priority and consistently demonstrate this commitment through their actions and resource allocation 10. Visible leadership, where leaders actively participate in HOP initiatives and routinely reinforce its principles, is crucial for setting the organizational tone and fostering a culture where safety is valued 5. Garnering leadership support is often the initial and most critical phase of HOP integration 22. Leaders need a deep understanding of HOP's core principles and the benefits it can bring to the organization to effectively champion its adoption 6. When leaders are genuinely engaged and accountable for creating and maintaining a culture of safety, it sends a powerful message throughout the organization, paving the way for successful HOP implementation.
Employee Involvement and Participation
Actively involving employees at all levels is another critical factor in the successful implementation of HOP 1. Employees should be encouraged and empowered to identify areas for improvement and provide valuable feedback on work processes and systems based on their firsthand experience 20. Engaging those who perform the work daily in problem-solving initiatives is a highly effective way to prevent injuries and improve overall performance 1. HOP principles inherently empower workers to contribute to safety improvements, fostering a sense of trust and collaboration within the organization 5. When employees feel valued and their insights are taken seriously, they are more likely to report hazards, near misses, and actively participate in developing practical solutions 5. Cultivating a sense of community participation and genuinely considering the perspectives of participants at all levels of the organization are essential for successful HOP adoption 22. Frontline workers possess unique and invaluable insights into the realities of their work, making their involvement crucial for identifying and implementing effective and sustainable solutions.
System-Focused Approach and Continuous Learning
A fundamental aspect of successful HOP implementation is adopting a system-focused approach that views HOP as an integral part of the organization's overarching strategy 2. The emphasis should be on understanding how work is actually performed and proactively improving work processes and systems to support safe and efficient performance 20. Establishing robust learning systems that facilitate the analysis of events without resorting to blame is paramount for identifying underlying systemic issues 3. Furthermore, organizations must commit to continuously evaluating the effectiveness of their HOP program and making targeted improvements to work processes and systems based on the lessons learned 20. This involves actively practicing how to learn and improve, both proactively by identifying potential risks and reactively by analyzing past events 22. By focusing on the interconnectedness of various elements within the system and how they contribute to performance, organizations can address the root causes of errors rather than just treating the symptoms, leading to more sustainable and impactful improvements.
Effective Communication and Training Strategies
Clear and consistent communication, coupled with comprehensive training strategies, are vital for the successful implementation of HOP 5. Building awareness and providing thorough education to both leaders and workers on the core principles of HOP and their practical application is essential 5. Providing clear communication about the benefits of HOP and involving all stakeholders early in the implementation process can help to overcome resistance to change and foster buy-in 5. Cultivating HOP fluency throughout the organization requires ongoing education and continued exposure to its principles, facilitating a fundamental shift in thinking about safety and performance 6. Utilizing workshops to discuss real-world case studies and examples of HOP in action can be a highly effective way to illustrate its value and encourage its adoption 5. Effective communication and training ensure that everyone within the organization understands the rationale behind HOP, their role in its success, and the benefits it can bring to both the individual and the organization as a whole.
V. Comparison of Successful and Unsuccessful HOP Implementations: Key Differentiators and Lessons Learned
Comparing successful and unsuccessful implementations of Human and Organizational Performance (HOP) reveals several key differentiators that highlight the critical factors for effective adoption.
Key Differentiators
A primary distinction lies in the level of leadership commitment. Successful HOP implementations are characterized by strong, visible, and sustained support from organizational leaders 5. In contrast, unsuccessful attempts often suffer from a lack of leadership buy-in and engagement. Another crucial differentiator is the extent to which a genuine cultural shift occurs within the organization 13. Successful HOP adoption involves a fundamental transformation towards a culture that values learning, fosters trust, and promotes a blame-free environment for reporting and analyzing incidents 22. This cultural shift impacts deeply held beliefs about blame, the nature of error, the definition of safety, and the role of the worker. Unsuccessful implementations often fail to address these underlying cultural issues, leading to superficial adoption of HOP principles.
Furthermore, the degree of employee engagement is a significant distinguishing factor. Organizations with successful HOP initiatives actively involve employees at all levels in identifying problems and developing solutions 1. Conversely, a lack of meaningful employee involvement is a common characteristic of unsuccessful HOP implementations. The focus on systemic factors versus individual blame also differentiates successful from unsuccessful attempts. Successful HOP initiatives prioritize understanding and addressing the systemic contributors to errors 2, while unsuccessful ones may revert to traditional approaches that primarily focus on individual accountability. Finally, successful HOP implementation is recognized as a long-term journey requiring patience and perseverance 6. Unsuccessful attempts often suffer from a lack of patience and are driven by unrealistic expectations of quick results.
Lessons Learned
Several valuable lessons can be gleaned from the experiences of organizations that have implemented HOP. It is often beneficial to start small by piloting HOP initiatives in high-risk areas to demonstrate their effectiveness and build momentum 5. Identifying and engaging early adopters and advocates within the organization who understand the principles and can champion the change is also crucial 22. Recognizing that each organization, and even different parts within the same organization, may have unique shared beliefs and assumptions is essential. Therefore, a tailored approach to implementation is more likely to succeed than a standardized, "one-size-fits-all" rollout 22. A central focus should be on fostering a culture of learning from both successes and failures, ensuring a blame-free environment where individuals feel safe to report and discuss incidents openly 2. To gauge the effectiveness of HOP initiatives, it is important to track relevant metrics such as incident rates, near-miss reports, and employee engagement levels 5. Integrating HOP principles with existing safety management frameworks, such as OSHA regulations or ISO standards, can also enhance overall safety strategies 5. Finally, it is essential to proactively address resistance to change by clearly communicating the benefits of HOP and involving stakeholders early in the process to build understanding and support 5.
VI. Conclusion: Key Insights and Recommendations for Effective HOP Implementation
Human and Organizational Performance (HOP) provides a transformative framework for enhancing safety and overall organizational performance by shifting the focus from individual blame to understanding the systemic factors that influence human behavior within the workplace. Successful implementation requires a fundamental change in mindset, embracing the principles that error is normal, blame fixes nothing, context drives behavior, learning is vital, and how we respond to failure matters.
Key insights from the analysis of various case studies reveal that strong leadership commitment and active employee engagement are critical enablers for HOP to thrive. Organizations that have successfully adopted HOP have demonstrated a commitment to continuous learning, fostering a culture of trust and psychological safety where employees feel empowered to report issues and contribute to solutions. Furthermore, a system-focused approach that addresses the underlying causes of errors, rather than just the symptoms, leads to more sustainable and impactful improvements. It is important to recognize that HOP is not a quick fix but a continuous journey of improvement that requires patience and persistence.
Based on these insights, the following recommendations are offered for organizations considering or currently implementing HOP:
Secure strong leadership buy-in and active participation: Leadership must champion HOP principles and visibly demonstrate their commitment to creating a culture of safety and learning.
Invest in education and training: Provide comprehensive training to build HOP fluency across all levels of the organization, ensuring everyone understands the core principles and their application.
Establish mechanisms for proactive and reactive operational learning: Implement processes such as Learning Teams to facilitate the analysis of both successes and failures, identifying systemic factors and opportunities for improvement.
Integrate HOP principles into existing processes and systems: Align current safety management systems, incident investigations, and training programs with the principles of HOP to ensure a consistent approach.
Foster a culture of trust and psychological safety: Create an environment where employees feel safe to report errors, near misses, and concerns without fear of reprisal, encouraging open and honest communication.
Focus on understanding the context of work and involving frontline employees in problem-solving: Recognize the valuable insights of those who perform the work and actively involve them in identifying challenges and developing practical solutions.
Be patient and persistent: Understand that cultural change takes time and sustained effort. Celebrate small wins and remain committed to the long-term journey of continuous improvement.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the impact of HOP initiatives: Track relevant metrics and gather feedback to assess the effectiveness of HOP implementation and make necessary adjustments.
By embracing these recommendations, organizations can effectively leverage the principles of HOP to create safer, more efficient, and more resilient workplaces where learning and continuous improvement are deeply embedded in the organizational culture.
References
1. Human and Organizational Performance (HOP): another way to thing about safety - SAIF, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://www.saif.com/documents/SafetyandHealth/Leadership/S1104_Human_and_Organizational_Performance_%28HOP%29-Another_way_to_think_about_safety.pdf
2. IMCA IN 1681: Human and Organisational Performance (HOP), accessed on March 14, 2025, https://www.imca-int.com/resources/technical-library/human-and-organisational-performance/
3. Embracing Human and Organizational Performance (HOP): Principles for a Safer and More Productive Environment - SafetyStratus, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://www.safetystratus.com/blog/embracing-human-and-organizational-performance-hop-principles-for-a-safer-and-more-productive-environment/
4. What is HOP? A Quick Introduction to the Fail Safely Movement - Safesite, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://safesitehq.com/human-organizational-performance-hop/
5. The Role of Human Organizational Performance (HOP) in Modern Safety Programs, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://toddjeromejenkins.com/safety-management/hop/the-role-of-human-organizational-performance-hop-in-modern-safety-programs/
6. My Introductory HOP Implementation Manifesto - The HOP Nerd, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://www.thehopnerd.com/post/my-introductory-hop-implementation-manifesto
7. What is HOP? - TapRooT® Root Cause Analysis, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://taproot.com/what-is-hop/
8. Understanding Human and Organizational Performance (HOP) Part 2: Error is Normal, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://www.safetystratus.com/blog/understanding-human-and-organizational-performance-hop-part-2-error-is-normal/
9. HOP is a Journey, Not a Destination - Energy Workforce & Technology Council, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://www.energyworkforce.org/hop-is-a-journey-not-a-destination/
10. HOP (Human and Organisational Performance) - Psg, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://practicalsolutionsgroup.com/hop-human-and-organisational-performance/
11. HOP, Root Cause Analysis, & Improving Human Performance, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://taproot.com/practical-guide-to-hop-taproot-rca-improving-human-performance/
12. Growing HOP: A brief guide to getting started with Human & Organizational Performance, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://www.thehopnerd.com/post/growing-hop-a-brief-guide-to-getting-started-with-human-organizational-performance
13. HOP Implementation: A brief guide to getting started with Human & Organizational Performance, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://www.thehopnerd.com/post/hop-implementation-a-brief-guiding-to-getting-started-with-human-organizational-performance
14. Understanding Human and Organizational Performance (HOP) Part 3: Blame Fixes Nothing, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://www.safetystratus.com/blog/understanding-human-and-organizational-performance-hop-part-3-blame-fixes-nothing/
15. A Guide to Human and Organizational Performance | SafetyCulture, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://safetyculture.com/topics/safety-performance/human-and-organizational-performance/
16. Human & Organizational Performance – A path to improvement for all organizations - National Safety Council, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://www.nsc.org/getmedia/6dc7b76d-09a2-4ad5-9be2-0b0365c34b46/nsm-wk4-mi
17. HOP Safety Principles to Improve Safety | Benchmark Gensuite, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://benchmarkgensuite.com/case-studies/hop-safety-principles-to-improve-engagement-and-safety/
18. How CHEP have adopted HOP to improve work | HOPLAB | Article, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://www.southpacinternational.com/hop/how-chep-have-adopted-hop-to-improve-work/
19. HOP Case Study: CHEP | Part 2 - YouTube, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qfQZc5SJb8
20. What are the key elements of a successful Human and Organizational Performance program and how can they be implemented in an organization? - High Reliability Training, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://www.trainhro.com/what-are-the-key-elements-of-a-successful-human-and-organizational-performance-program-and-how-can-they-be-implemented-in-an-organization/
21. Is Human and Organizational Performance (HOP) a New Approach to Safety?, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://www.aubreydaniels.com/media-center/safety/articles/is-human-and-organizational-performance-hop-a-new-approach-to-safety
22. An Introduction to the 5 Phases of HOP Integration - Safety Differently, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://safetydifferently.com/an-introduction-to-the-5-phases-of-hop-integration/
23. A Short Introduction to Human and Organizational Performance (HOP) and Learning Teams, accessed on March 14, 2025, https://safetydifferently.com/a-short-introduction-to-human-and-organizational-performance-hop-and-learning-teams/