The Future of ESG Reporting in the Face of Anti-ESG Trends
The rise of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting has been one of the most significant developments in the corporate world in recent years. ESG reporting aims to provide stakeholders with a comprehensive view of a company's performance beyond traditional financial metrics, encompassing its environmental impact, social responsibility, and governance practices. However, the ESG movement has recently faced a growing wave of anti-ESG sentiment, particularly in the United States, where political polarization and concerns about "woke capitalism" have led to pushback against ESG initiatives. Studies suggest this anti-ESG movement has the potential to reshape the future of ESG reporting, creating both challenges and opportunities for companies and investors alike. This article explores these potential impacts, delves into how companies are responding, and examines the evolving regulatory landscape and expert opinions that will shape the future of ESG reporting.
The Rise of Anti-ESG Sentiment
The anti-ESG movement has gained momentum in recent years, fueled by various factors, including political ideologies, corporate resistance to change, skepticism about the effectiveness of ESG criteria, and concerns over potential economic impacts 1. Some critics argue that ESG initiatives hinder company profits and growth, prioritizing social and environmental objectives over financial performance 1. Others view ESG as a form of "woke capitalism" that infringes on business autonomy and imposes a progressive political agenda on corporations 1.
This backlash has manifested in various forms, including shareholder activism campaigns, legislative measures, and legal challenges. In the United States, ESG has become a political battleground, with some states issuing extensive ESG mandates while others have adopted measures to exclude banks supporting ESG policies on issues such as climate change and gun control 2. Shareholder proposals targeting DEI efforts have also surged amid increasing political and legal scrutiny of corporate DEI initiatives 3.
Further illustrating this trend, a recent data analysis found that financial investments into global ESG funds were cut in half in 2024 4. Experts attribute this decline to the rise of anti-ESG sentiment, particularly in the U.S., and concerns about low returns on investment 4. In Europe, the leading market for ESG funds, 351 ESG funds closed in 2024, outpacing 235 fund launches 4. This decline can be attributed to several factors, including the rise of anti-ESG campaigns in the U.S., stricter greenwashing rules in the EU, and the election of a climate-skeptic president in the U.S4..
Adding to the complexity of the anti-ESG movement, it's crucial to understand the specific types of proposals gaining traction. As revealed in the 2024 proxy season, anti-ESG proposals are not monolithic but rather target various aspects of corporate behavior. The following table provides a breakdown of these proposal types and their outlook for the 2025 proxy season:
This detailed breakdown reveals the multifaceted nature of the anti-ESG movement and its potential to influence various aspects of corporate governance and reporting5.
Potential Impact of Anti-ESG Trends on ESG Reporting
The anti-ESG trends have the potential to significantly impact the future of ESG reporting. Companies that were once eager to highlight their ESG credentials in annual reports and investor presentations are now adopting a more cautious approach to avoid alienating investors and stakeholders who are skeptical of ESG 1. Some companies are scaling back their ESG-related disclosures or reframing them in terms of risk management and long-term value creation rather than as standalone sustainability initiatives 1. This shift in communication strategy reflects the need for companies to balance the expectations of ESG-conscious investors with the concerns of those who view ESG with skepticism.
However, the anti-ESG movement can also be viewed as a catalyst for companies to reassess and strengthen their ESG strategies 2. By addressing the concerns raised by critics, companies can refine their ESG initiatives, improve transparency, and build trust with a broader range of stakeholders. This could lead to more robust and meaningful ESG reporting that accurately reflects a company's commitment to sustainability and responsible business practices.
Furthermore, the anti-ESG movement could lead to a decline in the quality and comparability of ESG reporting 6. With increased scrutiny and potential legal challenges, companies may be less willing to disclose comprehensive and detailed information about their ESG performance. This could make it more difficult for investors and other stakeholders to assess a company's true sustainability impact and make informed decisions.
How Companies are Responding to Anti-ESG Sentiments
Companies are responding to anti-ESG sentiments in various ways. Some are taking a step back and critically examining their ESG commitments, with many citing concerns around alienating specific customers or stakeholders 1. For instance, some retail companies have become wary of taking strong stances on social issues, fearing backlash from consumers who may disagree with their positions 1. Similarly, major industries, particularly those in the extractive sector like oil and gas, have been vocal in their opposition to ESG policies 1.
Other companies are re-affirming their calls to sustainable causes and actions 2. They are responding to investor concerns about potential financial risks while still implementing ESG initiatives 3. Some companies are even leveraging ESG criticism to their advantage, using it as an opportunity to improve their ESG practices and build trust with stakeholders 7.
Interestingly, some companies are strategically shifting their focus from broader social issues to more directly business-related ESG factors 8. This adaptation suggests that companies are becoming more discerning in their ESG initiatives, prioritizing those that align with their core business objectives and resonate with a wider range of stakeholders.
New Regulations and Policies Related to ESG Reporting
Despite the anti-ESG backlash, the regulatory landscape for ESG reporting continues to evolve. In the European Union, regulatory clarity and consistency are crucial for the successful implementation of ESG strategies 2. The EU has introduced several regulations, such as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) for companies and the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) for investors, to promote transparency and comparability in ESG reporting 2. A key component of the EU's sustainability agenda is the 'Fit for 55' Package, a comprehensive plan to reduce EU greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by at least 55% by 2030 9. This package incorporates various legislative measures to support this goal, further driving ESG adoption across various sectors.
In 2025, the influence of the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) sustainability disclosure standards (IFRS S1 and S2) will be felt globally, helping to drive consistent and transparent sustainability reporting across jurisdictions in line with global ESG expectations 10. These standards are poised to play a crucial role in harmonizing ESG reporting and providing a common language for companies to communicate their sustainability performance.
In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed climate disclosure rules that would require companies to publish their greenhouse gas emissions and other climate-related information in their annual SEC filings 8. However, these rules have faced criticism and legal challenges, and their future remains uncertain under the new administration 11.
Challenges in ESG Disclosure
While ESG reporting offers numerous benefits for companies, it also presents several challenges. One significant hurdle is the constantly evolving regulatory landscape 12. Companies must stay informed about new regulations and reporting requirements, which can be resource-intensive and complex. This challenge is further compounded by the lack of standardization in ESG reporting 12. With no universally accepted framework, inconsistencies and difficulties arise in comparing disclosures across companies. This lack of standardization can also contribute to "greenwashing," where companies exaggerate their ESG efforts to appear more sustainable than they are.
Another challenge lies in data collection and quality 12. Many organizations struggle to gather accurate and comprehensive data for their ESG reports, particularly those with less mature ESG reporting practices or inadequate data management systems. This challenge highlights the need for robust data management systems and processes to ensure the accuracy and reliability of ESG data.
Expert Opinions and Predictions on the Future of ESG Reporting
Experts predict that the future of ESG reporting will be shaped by several key trends:
Regional divides will deepen: Europe and Asia remain ambitious about ESG, while the U.S. and some emerging markets are grappling with political resistance 13. This could lead to a fragmented regulatory landscape and challenges for multinational companies operating in different regions. These companies will need to navigate differing expectations and potentially adapt their ESG reporting to comply with various regulatory requirements.
Transparency will require upskilling: Companies will need to develop new expertise on boards and executive teams to comply with evolving ESG reporting regulations 13. This will require increased investment in ESG-related training and development. As ESG reporting becomes more complex and standardized, companies will need to ensure they have the necessary skills and knowledge to meet these demands.
Tech will lead the charge: AI and blockchain are set to revolutionize ESG reporting, enabling real-time monitoring of supply chains and automated sustainability audits 13. These technologies can enhance data collection, analysis, and reporting, improving the efficiency and accuracy of ESG disclosures.
Corporate activism will rise: Polarized attitudes around ESG will likely lead to increased activism among investors 13. Boards need to be prepared for this and engage with stakeholders proactively. Companies will need to actively communicate their ESG strategies and performance to address investor concerns and build trust.
ESG integration into core business strategy will go mainstream: ESG alignment with central business objectives will become the norm, driven by regulatory deadlines, growing awareness of climate risks, and stakeholder interest in sustainability 14. Companies will increasingly integrate ESG considerations into their core business strategies, recognizing the link between sustainability and long-term value creation.
Increased Scrutiny of CSRD Filers: With the first wave of CSRD reports expected in 2026, companies will face intense scrutiny for their inaugural disclosures 15. There is a concern that inconsistencies in double materiality assessments (DMAs) could arise, potentially leading to under- or over-reporting of material impacts, risks, and opportunities. This highlights the need for companies to carefully consider their DMA methodologies and ensure alignment with established risk management practices.
To enhance the impact and clarity of ESG disclosures, experts recommend adopting several best practices 12:
Engage Stakeholders: Involving key stakeholders in the reporting process allows companies to gather valuable feedback and tailor their reports to meet the needs and expectations of those affected.
Ensure Data Accuracy: Establishing robust data collection and verification procedures is essential to maintaining the reliability of the reported information.
Define SMART Objectives: Setting Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound (SMART) goals helps focus reporting efforts and ensures that disclosures are impactful and precise.
Improve Continuously: ESG reporting should be viewed as an ongoing process, with regular updates to incorporate new data, adapt to evolving standards, and address stakeholder feedback.
Synthesis and Conclusion
The future of ESG reporting is at a crossroads, characterized by both challenges and opportunities. The anti-ESG movement, while posing a significant hurdle, also presents a chance for companies to refine their ESG strategies, improve transparency, and build trust with stakeholders. The evolving regulatory landscape, with initiatives like the CSRD in Europe and the SEC's proposed climate disclosure rules in the U.S., will continue to shape ESG reporting practices. Moreover, technological advancements, such as AI and blockchain, are poised to revolutionize ESG data collection and reporting, enhancing efficiency and accuracy.
Companies that proactively adapt to these changes, embrace transparency, and integrate ESG into their core business strategies will be well-positioned to navigate the challenges and capitalize on the opportunities that lie ahead 16. By demonstrating a genuine commitment to sustainability and responsible business practices, companies can not only meet regulatory requirements but also enhance their reputation, attract investors, and contribute to a more sustainable future.
However, the contrasting trends in ESG adoption between different regions, particularly the divergence between Europe and the U.S., present a significant challenge for multinational corporations 13. These companies will need to carefully navigate these diverging expectations and develop strategies to ensure compliance and maintain their commitment to sustainability across different jurisdictions.
Ultimately, the future of ESG reporting hinges on the ability of companies to effectively address the concerns raised by the anti-ESG movement, adapt to evolving regulations, leverage technological advancements, and engage with stakeholders transparently and authentically. By doing so, they can ensure that ESG reporting remains a valuable tool for driving sustainable business practices and creating long-term value for all stakeholders.
References
1. The rise of anti ESG sentiment: Corporations, regulations, and the ..., accessed on February 25, 2025, https://farrellymitchell.com/sustainability-esg/anti-esg-sentiment/
2. ESG is here to stay! :: Environmental Finance, accessed on February 25, 2025, https://www.environmental-finance.com/content/analysis/esg-is-here-to-stay.html
3. Report: New Policy Landscape Turbocharges DEI & ESG Activism in ..., accessed on February 25, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/report-new-policy-landscape-turbocharges-dei--esg-activism-in-2025-proxy-season-302384791.html
4. New report uncovers worrying trend among investors — here's how ..., accessed on February 25, 2025, https://www.thecooldown.com/green-business/esg-funds-investor-interest/
5. Report: New Policy Landscape Turbocharges DEI & ESG Activism in 2025 Proxy Season, accessed on February 25, 2025, https://www.conference-board.org/press/pressdetail.cfm?pressid=22978
6. The Incoherence of ESG: Why We Should Disaggregate the ... - AIER, accessed on February 25, 2025, https://aier.org/article/the-incoherence-of-esg-why-we-should-disaggregate-the-environmental-social-and-governance-label/
7. Council Post: How ESG Criticism Strengthens The Movement - Forbes, accessed on February 25, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesfinancecouncil/2024/09/24/how-esg-criticism-strengthens-the-movement/
8. Special report: ESG under strain | Thomson Reuters, accessed on February 25, 2025, https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en/reports/esg-under-strain
9. All 2025 ESG and non-financial reporting regulations in the EU - PlanA.Earth, accessed on February 25, 2025, https://plana.earth/academy/eu-esg-regulations
10. The Evolving Landscape Of ESG Reporting Regulation: Expectations For 2025, accessed on February 25, 2025, https://www.anthesisgroup.com/insights/the-evolving-landscape-of-esg-reporting-regulation-expectations-for-2025/
11. Climate and Sustainability Regulations: 2024 End-of-Year Review - Cooley, accessed on February 25, 2025, https://www.cooley.com/news/insight/2025/2025-01-06-climate-and-sustainability-regulations-2024-end-of-year-review
12. ESG Disclosure: Importance, Challenges & Best Practices - Apiday, accessed on February 25, 2025, https://www.apiday.com/blog-posts/understanding-esg-disclosure-a-guide-for-effective-reporting
13. The future of ESG in 2025: a world divided - The Corporate Governance Institute, accessed on February 25, 2025, https://www.thecorporategovernanceinstitute.com/insights/news-analysis/the-future-of-esg-in-2025/
14. ESG in 2025: Significant adaptation in sustainability emerges as business-as-usual, accessed on February 25, 2025, https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en-us/posts/esg/2025-predictions/
15. 10 Predictions For ESG And Sustainability In 2025 - Verdantix, accessed on February 25, 2025, https://www.verdantix.com/insights/blogs/10-predictions-for-esg-and-sustainability-in-2025
16. Why ESG Reporting Is More Important Than Ever: Key Benefits for Companies, accessed on February 25, 2025, https://www.iriscarbon.com/why-esg-reporting-is-more-important-than-ever-key-benefits-for-companies/